
Another reason for America’s stinginess is that Pentagon officials worry that sending too many HIMARS to Ukraine depletes U.S.
#Words rock game free how to
And the Ukrainians seem to have figured out how to work the HIMARS they have just fine. But bureaucratic delays are surmountable.

Why? The typical answer is that it takes time to deploy HIMARS and to train Ukrainians to operate them. It's just that America has not moved speedily enough to send them to Ukraine. It’s not that these systems do not exist. Vickers told the New York Times that Ukraine could win the artillery battle against Russia with 60 to 100 HIMARS. In July, former Pentagon official Michael G. According to the Department of Defense, the next shipment of arms to Ukraine will include HIMARS ammunition. Imagine what the Ukrainians could do with more of them. Sixteen of these systems have been enough to change the trajectory of the war.

The Ukrainians slowed the Russian advance to a crawl thanks to the help of U.S.-supplied High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS). The moment requires him to act.Īmerica must give Ukraine the means to build on its recent success. President Biden could raise the stakes for Putin in ways that will help bring the war to an end. Putin is not the only leader with cards to play. The truth is that escalation has risks for both sides. He wants to paint a scary portrait of the future so that Western governments abandon Ukraine. His goal is to intimidate the democracies into paralysis. Why? Because he might not survive the reaction. Yet he won’t impose a general mobilization of either the Russian economy or the Russian people. Casualties up and down the chain of command are why Putin called to expand the military. The life expectancy of Russian generals has plunged. For how long and to what purpose? The flagship of the Russian Black Sea fleet is no more. Russia occupies some 20 percent of Ukraine. U.S.-led export controls have forced Russia to buy weaponry from ramshackle rogue states Iran and North Korea. Putin failed to achieve his initial war aim of regime change in Ukraine. Russia has lost a great deal since February 24, when Putin launched his unprovoked war on a neighboring democracy. "We haven’t lost anything, and we won’t lose anything," Putin declared.įake news. His indiscriminate shelling of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant turns nearby residents into hostages. Then he said he might cancel the deal that allows Ukrainian wheat exports to transit the Black Sea. On September 7, Putin warned that he might ban oil and gas exports to Europe altogether. On September 2, Gazprom shut down the Nord Stream One gas pipeline to Europe. The Russian autocrat threatened to escalate the conflict. ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield condemned Russia’s barbaric " filtration operations" whereby Ukrainian civilians are searched, interrogated, and marked for detention or population transfer. The finance ministers of the G7 agreed to a price cap on Russian oil (with details to follow).

The United States announced an additional $2.8 billion in aid to Ukraine and its neighbors, including $675 million in munitions, vehicles, and field equipment. It also reclaimed territory in the northeast. This week, Ukraine launched its long-awaited counteroffensive against Russian positions in the south. The war in Ukraine has taken another turn.
